For a long time, scientists have maintained their objectivity and said that it wasn't the place of science to dabble in ethics or spirituality. Carl Sagan knew better. For a man who had lifelong inspiration to explore the universe, an inspiration based on a profoundly spiritually notion of vastness. When you read a book like "Pale Blue Dot" you realize that Sagan has a deep and rich spiritualism regarding his work. While it may not be the place of science to discuss the human condition, Carl Sagan is more than a scientist, he is a human being. Why shouldn't the man who spent his life in awe of the universe be the one to share that with humanity?
Einstein was the first to understand the universe in a very new light and that changed not just his intellect but his feelings as well, shouldn't we place value in how that affects the world? Richard Dawkins has a better understanding of our origins than any of us, why shouldn't we listen to him about the importance of evolution? Feynman had a humble curiosity about the world, why should it be him that teaches us to not take anything for granted?
Just because a person is a scientist doesn't mean that they can't weigh in on moral and ethical issues. Only a handful of those who have experienced the firsthand awe of discovery have shared that immense amazement with us. Carl Sagan is a shining example of a person who isn't afraid to become a leader. He saw, was struck, and then showed it to all. More scientists should have the stones to follow in his footsteps.

No comments:
Post a Comment